| GA 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - AP 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - NT 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 → Vol.1No.2 | ||||||
| Vol.1, No.1, NT1
|
||||||
Simulation Technique for UT Wave Propagation as an Effective Tool for Predicting the Inspection Results and Interpreting the Root Cause of Unexpected Indications |
||||||
| Ichiro KOMURA 1 and Takashi FURUKAWA 2 1Nondestructive Evaluation Center 2Japan Power Engineering and Inspection Corporation |
||||||
KEYWORDS: |
||||||
| 1. Technical summary | ||||||
| Classification (I: Inspection, II: Repair, III: Replacement, IV: Preventive Maintenance, V: Others) | ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
| Fig. 1 Factors which affect to the UT wave propagation(1),(2) | ||||||
| 2. Scope | ||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
| 3. Features | ||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
| 4. Examples of Application | ||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
Fig. 8 Example for root cause investigation of indications(4) |
||||||
| 5. Reference | ||||||
|
||||||
| 6. Contact | ||||||
| Japan Society of Maintenology (ejam@jsm.or.jp) | ||||||













